🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous presidential campaign, Donald Trump wooed voters with pledges to reduce costs immediately upon taking office. However, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay precious little attention to affordability issues. This shifted following inflation-weary voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team initiated a slapdash effort to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days after the election, Trump kicked off his cost-reduction push with a disastrous statement: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for millions of Americans facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he dismissed their concerns as unimportant, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

This statement about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. How could every price be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were increasing costs? Official statistics show banana prices rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged 18.9%—in part due to import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six main grocery groups monitored by the government’s price index, such as animal proteins (rising over 4%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Inaccuracies in Financial Claims

Despite the evidence, the president continues to push his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “prices are way down,” and argued “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks ignore the fact that prices overall have clearly increased after the previous administration. At present, inflation is at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s 2% goal. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, despite official data indicate they are $3.19.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” rhetoric made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. Many voters are angry about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. In response, aides suggested one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Effects

With some tariffs reduced on several food items, Trump will probably announce that he has cut prices once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a blaze that he had started. In another instance, while speaking McDonald’s executives, he stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but they ring hollow to countless households facing hardships—particularly when many face losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while only 26% rate them positive. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans say the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s chief financial officer, lately disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost around tens of thousands of positions this year. Citing this weakness, Bessent called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to widespread concern about living costs, the president suggested a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” For many households in need, it seems like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will enact the proposal. The scheme would likely raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into the economy.

A further proposed solution for cost issues involved creating half-century home loans, with the notion that they could reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, reality is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these mortgages could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Outlook

In their cost-cutting effort, the administration have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, such as rising prices. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and untruthful allegations. Actually, the former president handed over a strong economy, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. But, Trump’s policies—particularly his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi worries that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation usually declines. Sadly, with the highly-touted affordability campaign probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might end up pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans cannot handle.